| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Activity Completion & Evidence
25 points (×6.25)
Shows completed activity?
|
4 points (25)
Activity clearly completed with strong visual/verbal evidence. Shows enthusiasm and genuine engagement with hands-on task. Process and/or results clearly demonstrated.
|
3 points (18.75)
Activity completed with good evidence shown. Solid effort demonstrated in completing the hands-on component. Most aspects of activity visible.
|
2 points (12.5)
Activity completed with basic evidence. Minimal but acceptable demonstration of task completion. Shows they did the work.
|
1 point (6.25)
Unclear if activity was completed or minimal evidence shown. Little effort apparent. Difficult to verify completion.
|
|
Career Research Depth
25 points (×6.25)
Steps 2, 4, 5 + connection?
|
4 points (25)
Full and specific coverage: Daily tasks, work environment, schedule specifics. Detailed education pathway (specific programs/schools). Clear job outlook with provincial data. Strong connection made between activity and career(s).
|
3 points (18.75)
Good coverage of all three areas with mostly specific details. Education pathway clear but may lack some specifics. Job outlook data present. Clear connection between activity and career shown.
|
2 points (12.5)
Basic coverage of most research areas. General education information provided. Some job outlook information but may be vague. Basic connection made to activity.
|
1 point (6.25)
Minimal research evident. Missing key information about career, education, or outlook. Very general or incomplete information. Weak or no connection to activity.
|
|
Skills for Success Application
25 points (×6.25)
3 skills with examples?
|
4 points (25)
Three Skills for Success clearly identified from official framework. Specific, realistic job examples for each skill. Examples directly connect to actual daily tasks and responsibilities.
|
3 points (18.75)
Three skills identified correctly. Good examples provided for most skills. Examples relate to the job but may lack some specificity.
|
2 points (12.5)
2-3 skills identified. Basic examples provided but may be generic. Some connection to actual job tasks shown.
|
1 point (6.25)
Fewer than 2 skills identified or incorrectly labeled. Examples missing or too vague. Little connection to actual job requirements.
|
|
Sources & Citations
25 points (×6.25)
Job outlook sources?
|
4 points (25)
2+ credible sources clearly cited for job outlook data. Uses authoritative sources (Job Bank, StatsCan, industry associations). Clear attribution (e.g., "According to Job Bank...").
|
3 points (18.75)
1-2 sources cited appropriately. Generally credible sources used. Most claims properly attributed.
|
2 points (12.5)
At least 1 source mentioned. Basic attribution present but may be vague. Source appears credible.
|
1 point (6.25)
No sources cited or only vague references. Cannot verify job outlook information. Source credibility questionable.
|