| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Content & Accuracy
40 points (×10)
All 5 steps covered?
|
4 points (40)
All 5 steps thoroughly addressed with specific, accurate details. Clear role description, skills explained, education paths specific, current sustainability actions, data-backed outlook.
|
3 points (30)
All 5 steps addressed with mostly accurate info. Minor details missing but core content present. Relevant but may lack some specificity.
|
2 points (20)
4 of 5 steps covered OR all 5 covered superficially. Basic accuracy with some minor errors. General info but lacks depth.
|
1 point (10)
3 or fewer steps addressed. Significant inaccuracies or misunderstandings. Very superficial treatment.
|
|
Research & Citations
20 points (×5)
Sources cited?
|
4 points (20)
3+ credible sources clearly cited in video. Uses MiHR resources (additional sources optional). Specific attribution (e.g., "According to MiHR's report...").
|
3 points (15)
2-3 sources cited appropriately. Most information attributed to sources. Primarily credible sources.
|
2 points (10)
1-2 sources cited. Basic attribution present but may be vague. Generally credible sources.
|
1 point (5)
No sources cited or only 1 vague reference. Cannot verify information. Questionable reliability.
|
|
Engagement & Creativity
20 points (×5)
Compelling to watch?
|
4 points (20)
Captivating opening, maintains interest throughout. Creative approach, excellent pacing. Unique perspective or storytelling.
|
3 points (15)
Good hook and maintains interest. Some creative elements. Generally good pacing with minor slow spots.
|
2 points (10)
Adequate attempt at engagement. Basic but clear presentation. May feel scripted but still watchable.
|
1 point (5)
Lacks energy or enthusiasm. Difficult to maintain attention. Monotone delivery or poor pacing.
|
|
Communication & Clarity
20 points (×5)
Clear messaging?
|
4 points (20)
Crystal clear audio/text. Logically organized, easy to follow. Smooth transitions. Appropriate vocabulary. Meets 60-90 second time limit.
|
3 points (15)
Generally clear with minor issues. Good organization with mostly smooth flow. Appropriate language. Within reasonable time range.
|
2 points (10)
Mostly understandable despite some issues. Basic organization. Message gets across. Close to time requirements.
|
1 point (5)
Difficult to understand. Confusing organization. Unclear messaging. Significantly over/under time limit.
|